During the time period defined as modernism the Adriatic coast of former Yugoslavia underwent a
massive transformation. Especially the rise of (mass) tourism left a strong imprint, which
characterizes the region until today. Almost unknown is that in the very same period of time the
area was also prone to the establishment of one of the most important defence lines of the country.
As a matter of fact a large number of military defence sites were built in strict secrecy along the
mainland and island coasts, intended to protect the non-aligned country from a potential NATO
attack.
Since the 1990s, the majority of military sites have stood empty and are being left to decayas are
a considerable number of tourist buildings from this period. These spaces are hence situated on
the most coveted building land of the (now) three countries. While the socialist tourist architecture
has attracted a lot of attention in recent years and has frequently been the subject of artistic and
scientific works, there is still a great deal of uncertainty regarding the military spaces.
The project Collective Utopias of Post-War Modernism: The Adriatic Coast as a Leisure and
Defence Paradise examines these phenomena military and tourism as well as their impact on
the Adriatic coast and the life of the local population. The project`s aim is to gain, interrelate and
visualize collective knowledge by bringing together different protagonists such as local residents,
former military functionaries, urban explorers, local historians or tourists. Through especially
developed and repeatedly redrawn mappings the projects tries to connect the past and the present
as well as official information and individual stories. Based on exemplary case studies a
methodological sequence is being implemented, which explores different levels of interaction
between the tourism and the military and opens the possibility to put them into a relation.
Hereinafter, these relations are discussed into detail with regard to the terms of function and fiction.
Consequently, various interpretations, qualities and manifestations of these relations are explained
and visualized. On the one hand, the interim research findings will be played back onto the field
with site-specific interventions and exhibitions, while on the other hand they will be made
accessible to a broad range of specialists, disseminating the information via conferences, blogs
and social media, thus bridging the gap between low-threshold emotional and academic-scientific
approaches. By incorporating several different voices the work highlights the absence of official
truths in order to subsequently serve the collective processing of this special building heritage.